🔗 Share this article

Following a significant regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from seeing recorded content of the violent event involving influencer Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an order issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Details of the Case and Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the regulator applied to the classification board to officially classify the available footage. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that allowed the commissioner to instruct social media companies to restrict access to the videos for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "refused classification".

Arguments Presented and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X asserted that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or offensive, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of public importance that prompted extensive public discourse". X even compared the video and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the review board concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with different editing might have met that threshold. Consequently, the board revised the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

A minority on the panel disagreed, arguing the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released long after the event, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Reactions to the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform expressed approval of the decision.

"X fought this case to uphold free speech and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains committed to safeguarding these fundamental values."

Representatives for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians who are minors".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the content were distressing, they had not met the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to apply sensitive content labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.