It is heartbreaking’: how 30 confined beluga whales are being used as tools in conflict over inhumane treatment.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a large but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.
A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a disagreement between a closed attraction, public officials and advocacy groups.
But those closest to the whales say the intense controversy over their future often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.
After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near the famous falls where they are housed warned to end their lives unless the authorities funds the upkeep of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.
Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals
Scientists say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and group interactions indicate they are remarkably smart creatures – something Kristy Burgess observed personally.
She spent three years as a whale caretaker, a position that involved gaining confidence of the marine predators.
“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the details and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She cultivated a deep bond for a pair of whales with opposing personalities.
“Eve accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each altered the way I understand bonding.”
Growing Opposition and Facility Decline
Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.
During her three years at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, died. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park attributes to natural mortality, but which advocates say reflects the poor conditions in which they were maintained.
The park did not open to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand effects of the closure. “Concrete is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and navigate with pieces in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”
The park did not comment to a inquiry, but in the past claimed: “The whales … receive far superior veterinary services and constant attention than any individual in the Britain, or other places.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
Burgess was terminated from the park in early March following the death of Eos, an sick beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the facility believed details of the death were disclosed to the media and she was let go shortly thereafter.
The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left her and other caretakers in despair. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any plans to put down even a single beluga would require “significant personnel”, equipment and specialized tools.
“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
She advocates for demands for the whales to be taken promptly from the park, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.
In the autumn, the nation’s government official denied a request to export the whales to an overseas location.
“Granting the proposal would have meant a continued existence in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the minister wrote. “As society, we know that belugas should be in the ocean, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience permit an relocation that would prolong the conditions these belugas have experienced.”
But the former trainer said the official’s statements reveal a broader incorrect perception of the facts of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”
Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate
As decision makers attempt to find a resolution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Inuit communities.
A suggested sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which has received government approval, has been contentious. The prospective location, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for some of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ future.
Others say the idea of a sanctuary reflects a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible solution in the short term.
Charles Vinick, director of the sanctuary project, said the facility will mimic the mental engagement and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|