🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously went for Zohran now. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.